Representative Work of Jonathan Jay
Reported Decisions
Anchor Wall, 2002 WL 538738 (D. Minn. 2002)
Lincoln Electric, 10 F. Supp. 856 (N.D. Ohio 1998), rvs'd, 210 F.3d 672 (6th Cir. 2000)
Mississippi Chemical, 1996 WL 293764 (S.D. Miss. 1996)
In Re Deppe, 110 B.R. 898 (D. Minn. 1990)
Environmental & Marine Services, 1996 WL 469352 (Minn. Ct. App. 1996)
Examples of Representative Cases
Defense representation of Fortune 500 subsidiary in false advertising case. Before federal court jury trial, plaintiff's demand in excess of $23,000,000 rejected. Following verdict, Court reduces compensatory award to less than $500,000. Affrimed by 9th Circuit, including en banc review (pet. denied).
Representation of biotechnology company in patent-related lawsuit arising from conflicting claims of ownership to bio-medical labeling technology involving submicroscopic plasmon resonance particles.
Defense of patent infringement litigation arising from manufacture and nationwide distribution of ornamental retaining wall block.
Representation of wafer carrier manufacturer in unfair competition litigation arising from Japanese distributor's manufacture and distribution of wafer carriers in Asia Pacific regions and other international territories.
Representation of major Fortune 500 company in defense of trademark infringement claims, venued in New York.
Representation of large furniture manufacturer in connection with trademark infringement and copyright infringement claims.
Defense of Florida-based computer company sued for trademark infringement and unfair competition in lawsuit venued in New York Federal Court.
Defense of Minnesota-based printing company accused of unfair competition and other business torts.
Defense of Denver franchisee in trademark infringement lawsuit, venued in Colorado Federal Court.
Representation of large paper manufacturer in commercial litigation dispute arising from complex purchase agreement involving sale and divestiture of paper processing and manufacturing facilities.
Representation of national sporting goods retailer sued in Federal Court in Maryland for trademark infringement and related claims.